The process of determining the difference between the actual results and the expected results based on the flexible budget is a critical analytical activity. This calculation involves adjusting the static budget to reflect the actual activity level achieved during the period. For example, if a company budgeted for 10,000 units but produced 12,000 units, the flexible budget would be based on the 12,000-unit level of activity. Comparing the actual costs incurred at the 12,000-unit level to the flexible budget provides a more accurate assessment of performance than comparing it to the static budget.
This analytical tool is significant because it offers a more realistic comparison than a static budget variance analysis. By isolating the impact of volume fluctuations from other performance factors, it allows management to better understand operational efficiency and cost control. Historically, the development of this technique provided a more nuanced view of budget performance, moving beyond simple comparisons to consider the complexities of changing business conditions. This enhanced understanding supports better decision-making and strategic planning.
